 |
The Magicanada Project
A Place For the In-Depth Discussion of Magic By Magicians Worldwide!
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Ben Train
Joined: 03 Jul 2008
Posts: 268
|
 Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 2:24 am Post subject: |
 |
|
I think it's more then that.
Convince is the objective, prove is how you get there. If one is proving you can UNDER prove or OVER prove. You either convince or don't. There's no in between.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Michael Kras
Site Admin
Joined: 07 Aug 2007
Posts: 1310
Location: Canada
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 2:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
True. And I think the line between proving and over-proving can be crossed by an unnatural break in effect timing to slowly and deliberately prove the fairness of the situation. Also, verbal proof is VERY easy to muck up if you're not careful. Of course, it's also quite possibly to under-prove if you rapidly move from one action to the next in a way that projects suspicion on account of your body language.
_________________
Michael Kras
Forum Administrator |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Join! (free) 
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
